But seemingly not - which is believable, as Brighton, Yarmouth and Bath seem to have been our most frequent ports of call this year. It was only three years ago that, I think, Catterick was our most-visited racecourse. Not this year, though, so it was particularly good to head up to 'God's own county'. And we did so on a very pleasant day. So I really enjoyed the trip to Thirsk, and doubly so because Parek (Sussex Girl) ran a very nice race. She only finished sixth of nine, but she was only beaten two lengths. Pretty much all the horses in the race had been running competitively recently (as the fact that we were the complete outsider of the field suggested) so this bold show, in only her second handicap, was very promising.
So that's no runners for us now until Saturday. One outing, though, between my eight-days-apart trips to Thirsk: this morning I headed over to Milton Keynes for the Sunday Forum. My heart had sunk when I had seen that the Davy Russell case was still rumbling on, as that's a topic which had already been done to death by racing's chattering classes. Whether we found anything to say on the subject this morning which hadn't already been said 10,000 times I don't know, but it seemed a straightforward programme anyway. We can't too expect too much at this time of year, as we are only now, of course, emerging from the silly season in which August traditionally sees inconsequential nonsense dominating the front pages.
Within racing's little world we might think that we've seen some trivial matters being discussed as if they were of world-changing importance, but that's nothing compared to the outside world. The Times/Mail story of the five-year-old Christian (if there is such a thing, which I doubt - surely you have to be older than five to be in a position to decide which, if any, religion you wish to join?) being placed with Muslim foster-parents was rammed down our throats as if it were a major issue, but surely such a situation is preferable to a five-year-old supposed Christian being placed with atheist or agnostic foster-parents? And that, presumably in these godless times, must happen all the time without seeming to attract any comment at all.
And that's not even to mention that anyone prepared to become a foster-parent, irrespective of their religion or, indeed, whether they even have a religion, should be exempt from any criticism from the rest of us, the vast majority who wouldn't take on a parent-less child in need in a month of Sundays. Yet we have had to endure this non-issue being given banner headlines - hot on the heels of the non-story of MPs' collective over-reaction to the silencing of Big Ben. I suppose, under the circumstances, Russellgate becoming the biggest story since Watergate isn't too weird at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment